转型时期行业协会经济自治的影响因素分析——基于广东、浙江两地的经验数据
Investigation of Factors Determining Trade Associations’ Self-Governance in Transition——Based on the Questionnaire Survey in Guangdong and Zhejiang

作者: 石碧涛 :东莞理工学院经济贸易系,东莞; 张捷 :暨南大学经济学院,广州;

关键词: 行业协会转型自治二分变量回归Trade Associations Transition Self-Governance Binary Choice Regression

摘要: 文章采用虚拟二分变量(binary dummy regression)方法,通过probit、logit和extreme value三种模型,对影响我国行业协会自治的因素进行回归分析。结果表明:理事单位占会员的比例、协会收入中来源于会费的比例越大,越不利于协会的自治;协会对违规者的惩罚力度、协会的决策程序民主度、政府授权给协会的管理权限越大(多),协会的自治效果越好。其他因素如协会成立的时间长短、协会专职人员的数量多少、协会经费中用于会员支出的比例等均未发现显著影响。

Abstract: This paper employs binary dummy regression, using probit, logit and extreme value to find out the influential factors associated with trade associations’ self-governance. The results show: The larger the tight-ness and the percentage of admission fees and fees from service to members and out-oriented service to trade associations’ total revenue is, the worse do trade associations self-govern; The more powerful the punishment and encouragement measures are, the more democratic the decision-making process is, the more autonomous rights government gives, the better do trade associations self-govern. Moreover, other factors such as the length of trade association’s history, the number of the association’s employers, the percentage of associa-tion’s expenditure for membership to its total expenditure have no significant effect. At last suggestion is given.

文章引用: 石碧涛 , 张捷 (2012) 转型时期行业协会经济自治的影响因素分析——基于广东、浙江两地的经验数据。 现代管理, 2, 101-110. doi: 10.12677/MM.2012.23018

参考文献

[1] P. Jeffrey, G. R. Salanick. The external control of organizations. New York: Harper and Row, 1978.

[2] U. Staber, H. Aldrich. Trade associations stability and public policy. In: R. H. Hall, R. E. Quinn, Eds., Organizational and Theory and Public Policy, London: Sage Publications, 1983.

[3] G. Wyn, W. Coleman. Conclusion. In: W. Grant, Ed., Business Interests, Organizational Development and Private Interest Government, Berlin: De Gruyter, 1987.

[4] 余晖. 行业协会组织的制度动力学原理[J]. 经济管理, 2001, 4: 22-29.

[5] 张静. 法团主义[M]. 北京: 中国社会科学出版社, 2005.

[6] 张捷, 张媛媛. 中国商会治理的基本特征及其经验证据[J]. 经济管理, 2009, 11: 148-153.

[7] U. Schaede. Self-regulation and the sanctuary strategy: Com- petitive advantage through domestic cooperation by Japanese firms. Working Paper of the Conference “The Changing Japa- nese Firms”, Columbia, 11-12 December 1999.

[8] F. Recanatini, R, Ryterman. Disorganization or self-organization? FEEM Working Paper No. 2600, 2000. http://ssrn.com/abstract=229274 or DOI:10.2139/ssrn.229274

[9] 贾西津, 沈恒超, 胡文安. 转型时期的行业协会: 角色、功能与管理体制[M]. 北京: 社会科学文献出版社, 2004.

[10] 马述忠, 沈国华. 对浙江省农产品行业协会运作模式的案例分析[J]. 中国农村经济, 2005, 1: 51-58.

[11] 张捷, 王霄, 赵永亮. 商会治理功能与组织边界的经济学研究——基于公共选择的理论框架与中国的经验证据[J]. 中国工业经济, 2009, 11: 109-119.

[12] 徐林清, 张捷. 我国行业协会的营利倾向与治理困境[J]. 南京社会科学, 2009, 3: 47-52.

分享
Top