Culture and Creativity: Case Study on Haishan Hall in Anping, Taiwan
作者: 陈坤宏 ：国立台南大学台湾文化研究所，台南;
Abstract: The aim of this paper is to explore cultural policy in Tainan City via “three cultural pillars” con-cepts: Technology, Institutions, and Spatial Culture. We will take on empirical study on cultural/creative ac-tivity and regeneration plan in relics in Tainan City. Some major research methods are applied, including in-depth interview, participant observation and document analysis. Data will be obtained from the interview answers of about 21 visitors and analysed via qualitative method. The outcomes of the paper are as follows: 1) Tainan City has good credits in “Technology” and “Institutions”, but insufficient in “Spatial Culture and Pub-lic Performance”. 2) Haishan Hall has only good credits in “Technology”, but insufficient in “Institutions” and “Spatial Culture and Public Performance”. 3) Images and charmingness of “Cultural Ancient City” have not yet integrated into city life and it is same as socio-economic development. Furthermore we think one city must construct a “creative/cultural city model” as its city’s future direction.
文章引用: 陈坤宏 (2012) 文化与创意：台南市安平海山馆的个案研究。 社会科学前沿， 1， 88-96. doi: 10.12677/ASS.2012.13014
 产官学合作打造台南设计村[N]. 中国时报, 2012-5-4.
 S. Lash, J. Urry. Economics of signs and space. London: Sage, 1994.
 D. Hesmondhalgh. The cultural industries. London: Sage, 2007.
 J. Long. Sustaining creativity in the creative archetype: The case of Austin, Texas. Cities, 2009, 26(4): 210-219.
 A. Vanolo. The image of the creative city: Some reflections on urban branding in Turin. Cities, 2008, 25(6): 370-382.
 S. Miles, R. Paddison. The rise of culture led urban development. Urban Studies, 2005, 42(5-6): 833-839.
 B. Quinn. Art festivals and the city. In: R. Paddison, S. Miles, Eds., Culture-Led Urban Regeneration, Routledge, London and New York, 2007: 85-101,
 R. Florida. The rise of the creative class: And how it’s transforming work, leisure, community and everyday life. New York: Basic Books, 2002.
 M. S. Gertler. Creative cities: What are they for? How do they work and how do we build them? Ontario: Canadian Policy Research Networks, 2004.
 W. F. Lever. Competitive cities in Europe. Urban Studies, 1999, 36(5-6): 1029-1044.
 H. Udo-Ernst. Spaces for creativity and innovation. Creativity and Innovation Management, 2005, 14(3): 288-298.
 A. Markusen, D. King. The artistic divident: The arts’hidden contributions to regional development. Minneapolis: Humphrey Institute of Public Affairs, University of Minnesota, 2003.
 C. Gibson, N. Klocker. The “Cultural turn” in Australian regional economic development discourse: Neoliberalising creativity? Geographical Review, 2005, 43(1): 93-102.
 J. Peck. Struggling with the creative class. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 2005, 29(4): 770-790.
 J. Peck. Geography and public policy: Constructions of neoliberalism. Progress in Human Geography, 2004, 28(3): 392-405.
 J. Craik, G. Davis and N. Sutherland. Cultural policy and national identity. In: G. Davis, M. Keating, Eds., The Future of Governance: Policy Choices, Allen & Unwin, Sydney, 2002: 177- 209.
 D. Garcia. Decontructing the city of culture: The long-term cul- tural legacies of Glasgow 1990. Urban Studies, 2005, 42(5): 841-868.
 G. Waitt. Urban festivals: Geographies of hype, helplessness and hope. Geography Compass, 2008, 2(2): 513-537.
 Galway Arts Festival Press Office. Galway Arts Festival Press, 2006. http://www.galwayartsfestival.com/news.php?id=53