胰十二指肠切除术中胰消化道重建方式对术后胰瘘发生的影响
The Comparation of Different Pancreaticoenteric Reconstructions Designed to Prevent Pancreatic Fistula after Pancreatoduodenectomy

作者: 孙龙昊 * , 何向辉 , 刘彤 :天津医科大学总医院普通外科;

关键词: 胰十二指肠切除术胰瘘胰肠吻合术胰胃吻合术胰管支架<br>Pancreaticoduodenectomy Pancreatic Fistula Pancreaticojejunostomy Pancreaticogastrostomy Pancreatic Duct Stent

摘要: 胰十二指肠切除术被认为是治疗壶腹周围良恶性肿瘤的一种成熟安全的术式,但其术后并发症的发生率仍高,而术后胰瘘是最常见的并发症之一。本文回顾并比较了目前为防止胰瘘发生而设计的各种胰消化道重建术式效果的相关数据,旨在通过对各项大样本研究,meta分析,前瞻性研究,回顾性研究以及随机对照实验进行客观严格的分析而寻找最有效的吻合术式。但遗憾的是,世界范围内目前并没有就任何一种术式较其他方法存在优越性达成共识。

Abstract: Pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) has become an increasingly matured and safe operation for selected patients with benign and malignant periampullary disorders. However, the postoperative morbidity rate is still high. Pancreatic fistula (PF) is the most problematic common complication after PD. This article reviews and compares the available data on the outcome of various methods of pancreaticoenteric reconstruction designed for the prevention of PF. This paper is designed to do a critical analysis of clinical literature including large series, meta-analyses, and prospective, randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in order to compare the different pancreaticoenteric anastomosis and get the best management. As a result, there is no universal agreement as to whether one procedure is safer and less prone to PF than the others.

文章引用: 孙龙昊 , 何向辉 , 刘彤 (2012) 胰十二指肠切除术中胰消化道重建方式对术后胰瘘发生的影响。 外科, 1, 1-4. doi: 10.12677/hjs.2012.11001

参考文献

[1] [1] M. Kawai, H. Yamaue. Analysis of clinical trials evaluating complications after pancreaticoduodenectomy: A new era of pancreatic surgery. Surgery Today, 2010, 40(11): 1011-1017.

[2] C. Bassi, C. Dervenis, G. Butturini, et al. International study group on pancreatic fistula definition. Postoperative pancreatic fistula: An international study group (ISGPF) definition. Surgery, 2005, 138(1): 8-13.

[3] M. Kawai, M. Tani, S. Hirono, et al. How do we predict the clinically relevant pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy. An analysis in 244 consecutive patients. World Journal of Surgery, 2009, 33(12): 2670-2678.

[4] S. M. Strasberg, J. A. Drebin and N. J. Soper. Evolution and current status of the Whipple procedure: An update for gastroenterologists. Gastroenterology, 1997, 113(3): 983-994.

[5] R. Delcore, J. H. Thomas, G. E. Pierce, et al. Pancreaticogas- trostomy: A safe drainage procedure after pancreaticoduodenec- tomy. Surgery, 1990, 108(4): 641-647.

[6] G. R. Mason. Pancreatogastrostomy as reconstruction for pan- creatoduodenectomy: Review. World Journal of Surgery, 1999, 23(3): 221-226.

[7] F. G. Bartoli, G. B. Arnone, G. Ravera, et al. Pancreatic fistula and relative mortality in malignant disease after pancreatic- co-duodenectomy. Review and statistical meta-analysis regarding 15 years of literature. Anticancer Research, 1991, 11(5): 1831- 1848.

[8] C. J. Yeo, J. L. Cameron, M. M. Maher, et al. A prospective randomized trial of pancreatogastrostomy or pancreatojejuno- stomy after pancreaticoduodenectomy. Annals of Surgery, 1995, 222(4): 580-588.

[9] M. Watanabe, S. Usui, H. Kajiwara, et al. Current pancreatogas- trointestinal anastomotic methods: Results of a Japanese survey of 3109 patients. Journal of Hepatobiliary Pancreatic Surgery, 2004, 11(1): 25-33.

[10] S. Y. Peng, Y. P. Mou, Y. B. Liu, et al. Binding pancreaticojeju- nostomy: 150 consecutive cases without leakage. Journal of Ga- strointestional Surgery, 2003, 7(7): 898-900.

[11] S. Y. Peng, J. W. Wang, W. Y. Lau, et al. Conventional versus binding pancreaticojejunostomy after pancreaticoduodenectomy: A prospective randomized trial. Annals of Surgery, 2007, 245(5): 692-698.

[12] E. Buc, R. Flamein, C. Golffier, et al. Peng’s binding pancreatic- cojejunostomy after pancreaticoduodenectomy: A French pro- spective study. Journal of Gastrointestional Surgery, 2010, 14(4): 705-710.

[13] L. Maggiori, A. Sauvanet, G. Nagarajan, et al. Binding versus conventional pancreaticojejunostomy after pancreaticoduodenec- tomy: A case-matched study. Journal of Gastrointestional Sur- gery, 2010, 14(9): 1395-1400.

[14] J. M. Winter, J. L. Cameron, K. A. Campbell, et al. Does pan- creatic duct stenting decrease the rate of pancreatic fistula fol- lowing pancreaticoduodenectomy? Results of a prospective ran- domized trial. Journal of Gastrointestional Surgery, 2006, 10(9): 1280-1290.

[15] T. Imaizumi, T. Hatori, K. Tobita, et al. Pancreaticojejunostomy using duct-to-mucosa anastomosis without a stenting tube. Jour- nal of Hepatobiliary Pancreatic Surgery, 2006, 13(3): 194-201.

[16] V. Smyrniotis, N. Arkadopoulos, M. A. Kyriazi, et al. Does in- ternal stenting of the pancreaticojejunostomy improve outcomes after pancreatoduodenectomy? A prospective study. Langen- becks Archives of Surgery, 2010, 395(3): 195-200.

[17] P. Pessaux, A. Sauvanet, C. Mariette, et al. External pancreatic duct stent decreases pancreatic fistula rate after pancreatico- duodenectomy: Prospective multicenter randomized trial. Annals of Surgery, 2011, 253(5): 879-885.

[18] R. T. Poon, S. T. Fan, C. M. Lo, et al. External drainage of pan- creatic duct with a stent to reduce leakage rate of pancreaticoje- junostomy after pancreaticoduodenectomy: A prospective ran- domized trial. Annals of Surgery, 2007, 246(3): 425-435.

分享
Top