控股股东资产注入行为及其影响因素研究
Research on Majority Shareholders’ Behavior of Assets-Injecting and Its Influencing Factors

作者: 颜淑姬 , 许永斌 :;

关键词: 控股股东市场择时资产注入股权集中度关联交易Majority Shareholders Market Timing Assets-Injecting Private Placement HERF Related Transaction

摘要: 本文通过两方面的比较,运用Logistic 回归来研究控股股东在资产注入定向增发事件中的行为选择。在是否注资增发的行为选择中,研究发现市价或基准价格越低于每股内在价值的企业进行定向增发、大股东进行资产注入的可能性越大。其中关联交易程度和股权集中度对该决策具有显著影响,充分说明了控股股东进行注资增发的动因主要在于控制权巩固的激励及减少关联交易做强上市公司的同时获取更多收益。在是否以资产作为对价支付的行为选择中,控股股东确实存在选择偏好。且控股股东持股比例增加率及公司规模对方式选择有显著影响。没有发现控股股东背景对上述决策有显著影响。资产负债率等传统的解释股权再融资的控制变量在这里也缺乏解释力。

Abstract: This paper uses Logistic regression model to research majority shareholders’ behavior choices in the event of assets-injecting of private placement. It compares in two aspects. In the choice of whether to inject assets or not, this paper discovers that the companies whose market prices or benchmark prices are lower than their intrinsic value are more able to issue stocks to specific objects and their majority shareholders are more able to inject assets. Related transaction level and HERF are the two main factors which influence majority shareholders’ decision-making markedly. That suggests the main aims of majority shareholders’ injecting assets in private placement are solidifying control rights and reducing related transaction in order to improve listed companies and meanwhile wish to gain more profits in the future. In the choice of whether to purchase by assets or cash, this paper discovers that there really exists majority shareholders’ preference. Increment rate of shareholding ratio and size of the company are the two main factors which influence majority shareholders’ decision-making significantly. This paper doesn’t discover that majority shareholders’ background has prominent influence on the decision-making. Also, control variables such as asset-liability ratio which used to explain secondary equity offering traditionally can’t explain here.

文章引用: 颜淑姬 , 许永斌 (2011) 控股股东资产注入行为及其影响因素研究。 金融, 1, 71-79. doi: 10.12677/fin.2011.13011

参考文献

[1] 张鸣, 郭思永. 大股东控制下的定向增发和财富转移[J]. 会计研究, 2009, 30(5): 78-87.

[2] 何贤杰, 朱红军. 利益输送、信息不对称与定向增发折价[J]. 中国会计评论, 2009, 7(3): 283-298.

[3] 黄建欢, 尹筑嘉. 非公开发行、资产注入和股东利益均衡:理论与实证[J]. 证券市场导报, 2008, 18(5): 26-32.

[4] J. C. Stein. Rational capital budgeting in an irrational world. Journal of Business, 1996, 69(4): 429-455.

[5] 王雯, 张亦春. 中国股票市场价格对内在投资价值的偏离测度——基于F-O模型的实证检验[J]. 山东社会科学, 2009, 23(1): 85-89.

[6] 章卫东, 李海川. 定向增发新股、资产注入类型与上市公司绩效的关系[J]. 会计研究, 2010, 24(3): 58-64.

[7] Wruck, Karen Hopper. Equity ownership concentration and firm value: Evidence from private equity financings. Journal of Financial Economics, 1989, 23(1): 3-28.

[8] M. G. HertZel, R. L. Smith. Market discounts and shareholder gains for placing equity privately. Journal of Finance, 1993, 48(2): 459-485.

[9] 曾颖. 资产注入: 支付手段与市场反应[J]. 证券市场导报, 2007, 17(10): 29-33.

[10] M. Baker, J. Wurgler. Market timing and capital structure. Journal of Finance, 2002, 57(1): 1-32.

[11] 贾钢, 李婉丽. 定向增发整体上市的短期财富效应及其影响因素实证研究[A]. 中国会计学会学术年会论文集[C]. 长沙: 中国会计学会教育分会, 2008: 583-595.

[12] 陆正飞, 叶康涛. 中国上市公司股权融资偏好解析[J]. 经济研究, 2004, 50(4): 50-59.

[13] 刘婷, 唐宗明. 后股权分置时期大股东资产注入实证分析[J]. 科学技术与工程, 2010, 10(1): 146-151.

[14] 曾劲松. 上市公司定向增发定价的影响因素研究[J]. 中央财经大学学报, 2009, 29(5): 28-31.

分享
Top