关系型自我构念量表中文版的信效度检验
The Reliability and Validity of the Chinese Version of the Relational-Interdependent Self-Construal Scale

作者: 黄 丽 * , 毕重增 :西南大学,心理学与社会发展研究中心;

关键词: 关系型自我构念量表信度效度探索性因素分析验证性因素分析Relational-Interdependent Self-Construal Scale Reliability Validity Exploratory Factor Analy-sis Confirmatory Factor Analysis

摘要: 本文修订并检验了中文版关系型自我构念量表的信效度。参与本研究的有效被试包括来自泸州医学院的192名大学生和来自西南大学的237名大学生。研究发现新模型适配;内部一致性系数是0.80;关系型自我构念与独立我、互依我、短版独立我、短版互依我相关显著;与自信的相关是0.33;与16PF中的恃强性,兴奋性,有恒性,实验性,感情用事与安详机警性,心理健康人格因素,内向与外向性相关显著;性别差异显著(t = 5.47, p < 0.001)。结果表明该量表具有良好的信效度。

Abstract: This study investigated the reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the Relational-Inter- dependent Self-Construal Scale (RISCS). The effective participants of this study included 192 University students from Lu Zhou Medical College and 237 University students from SouthwesternUniversity. New model were fit. Internal consistency reliability coefficient of the scale was 0.80. The relationship between RISCS and independence self, interdependent self, short version of independent self, interdependent self were related significantly. And then, the relationship between RISCS and self-confidence was calculated as 0.33. RISCS and dominance, liveliness, persistence, openness to change, emotional reasoning, mental health, in- troverted and outgoing of 16PF were significantly correlated. The difference of sex was significant (t = 5.47, p < 0.001). The results show that this scale is a reliable and valid instrument.

文章引用: 黄 丽 , 毕重增 (2012) 关系型自我构念量表中文版的信效度检验。 心理学进展, 2, 173-178. doi: 10.12677/AP.2012.24027

参考文献

[1] 毕重增, 黄希庭(2006). 清晰度对自信预测效应的影响. 心理科学, 2期, 271-273.

[2] 陈朝阳, 黄远玲, 王鑫(2009). 国外关于关系型自我构念的研究进展. 宁波大学学报(人文科学版), 5期, 117-120.

[3] 段文杰, 白羽, 何敏贤, 唐小晴(2012). 跨文化研究中测量工具等价性操作流程初探: 我们从积极心理学中学到了什么? 心理学进展, 2期, 78-84.

[4] 陆洛(2007). 集体性与个人性特质对台湾大学生之重要性及其与自我增强之关系. 美中教育评论, 8期, 23-28.

[5] 王雪, 顾相菊(2010). 集体主义和个人主义——中美社会文化差异理解的关键. 科技信息, 27期, 167-168.

[6] 吴燕琴(2011). 人际关系不良引起的严重心理问题案例报告. 社会心理科学, 9期, 102-106.

[7] Arnocky, S., Stroink, M., & DeCicco, T. (2007). Self-construal predicts environmental concern, cooperation and conservation. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 27, 255-264.

[8] Chen, S., & Boucher, H. C. (2008). Relational selves as self-affirma- tional resources. Journal of Research in Personality, 42, 716-733.

[9] Chen, Y. R., Chen, X. P., & Portnoy, R. (2009). To whom do positive norm and negative norm of reciprocity apply? Effects of inequitable offer, relationship, and relational-self orientation. Journal of Expe- rimental Social Psychology, 45, 24-34.

[10] Cross, S. E., Bacon, P., & Morris, M. L. (2000). The relational-inter- dependent self-construal and relationship. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 791-808.

[11] Cross, S. E., & Madson, L. (1997). Models of the self: Self-construal and gender. Psychological Bulletin, 122, 5-37.

[12] Cross, S. E., & Morris, M. L. (2003). Getting to know you: The rela- tional self-construal, relational cognition, and well-being. Personal- ity and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29, 512-523.

[13] Cross, S. E., Morris, M. L., & Gore, J. S. (2002). Thinking about one- self and others: The relational-interdependent self-construal and so- cial cognition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 399-418.

[14] Gabriel, S., Renaud, J. M., & Tippin, B. (2007). When I think of you, I feel more confident about me: The relational self and self-confi- dence. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 43, 772-779.

[15] Gore, J. S., Cross, S. E., & Morris, M. L. (2006). Let’s be friends: Relational self-construal and the development of intimacy. Personal Relationships, 13, 83-102.

[16] Green, M. A., Scott, N. A., DeVilder, E. L., Zeiger, A., & Darr, S. (2006). Relational-Interdependent self-construal as a function bu- limic symptomatology. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 62, 943-951.

[17] Guimond, S., Chatard, A., Martinot, D., & Crisp, R. J. (2006). Social comparison, self-stereotyping, and gender differences in self-con- struals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90, 221-242.

[18] Lu, L., & Gilmour, R. (2007). Developing a new measure of inde- pendent and interdependent views of the self. Journal of Research in Personality, 41, 249-257.

[19] Ma, P. W., & Yeh, C. J. (2005). Factors influencing the career decision status of Chinese American youths. Career Development Quarterly, 53, 337-347.

[20] Markus, H., & Kitayama, S. (1991). Culture and the self implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation. Psychological Review, 98, 224-253.

[21] Singelis, T. M. (1994). The measurement of independent and interde- penden self-construals. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 20, 580-591.

[22] Singelis, T. M., & Sharkey, W. F. (1995). Culture, self-construal, and embarras-sability. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 26, 622- 644.

[23] Trafimow, D., & Madson, L. (2003). The importance of traits, group memberships and relationships. The Social Science Journal, 40, 447- 457.

分享
Top