欧美高等教育学习结果比较研究
A Study on Comparison Learning Outcomes in Higher Education in Europe and America

作者: 程海霞 :厦门大学教育研究院;

关键词: 欧美高等教育学习结果比较The EU and the United States Higher Education Learning Outcomes Comparison

摘要:

自20世纪80年代,学习结果作为保证高等教育质量的重要准则引起了一些国家的关注。时至今日,学习结果仍然是一个新课题并被不断的完善。其中欧盟和美国是在学习结果的制定和应用方面做得最好的国家,它们都形成了自己独特的经验和模式。但是作为两个国情不同的地区和国家,它们在学习结果制定的背景、学习结果的界定以及学习结果的应用等方面除了共性外,还有着各自的特点,对二者进行比较研究对于我们进一步理解学习结果具有非常重要的意义。

Abstract: Learning outcomes, as important guidelines to ensure quality of higher education, has raised some national concerns since 80 years of the 20th century. Today, learning outcomes is still a new subject and is constantly improving. The EU and the United States in the development and application of learning outcomes is doing their best, and they have formed their own unique experiences and models. But as two region and country with different conditions, they have their characteristics in the backgrounds definitions development and application of learning outcomes besides of common ones. Doing comparative study on the both for fur-thering our understanding of learning outcomes is very meaningful.

文章引用: 程海霞 (2011) 欧美高等教育学习结果比较研究。 教育进展, 1, 88-92. doi: 10.12677/ae.2011.13019

参考文献

[1] 熊耕. 美国高等教育认证制度面临的问题和挑战[J]. 比较教育研究, 2006, 1: 72.

[2] SEEC, NICATS, NUCCAT. Credit and qualifications-credit gui- delines for qualifications in England Wales and Northern Ireland, 2011. http://www.york.ac,uk/enterprise/eio/docs/nqf

[3] Council for Higher Education Accreditation (CHEA). Statement of mutual responsibilities for student learning outcomes: Accreditation, institutions and programs. Washington, DC: Council on Higher Education Accreditation, 2003: 5.

[4] Main documents: A Framework of qualification for the European Higher Education Area, 2010. http://www.bologna-bergen2005.no/.

[5] J. Gonzales, R. Wagenaar (Eds). Tuning educational Structures in Europe. Reference point for the design and delivery of degree programmes in business. Bilbao: Universidad de Deusto, 2008: 55.

[6] Western Association of Schools and Colleges. Handbook of Accreditation 2008: WSC Accrediting Commission for Senior Colleges and Universities, 2011.
http://www.wascsenior.Org/findit/files/forms/Handbook_of_Accre- ditation_2008_with_hyperlinks. pdf

[7] 毕家驹. 美国ABET的工程专业鉴定新进展[J]. 高教发展与评估, 2005, 1(5): 49.

[8] 孙超. 对美国大学生学习产出研究的反思[J]. 高教发展与评估, 2009, 5(6): 81.

[9] 周秀梅. 美国高等教育培养目标下的课程设置之研究[D]. 湖南师范大学, 2007.

[10] NSSE. Annual Survey Results (2005), 2009.
http://nsse.iub.edu/pdf/NSSE2005_annual_report.pdf

[11] ACT. The collegiate assessment of academic proficiency, 2009. http://www.act.org/caap/

[12] 毕家驹. 欧洲高等教育区的学位标准和质量保证准则及其启示[J]. 高教发展与评估, 2006, 5: 54.

分享
Top