中国情景下企业人力资源成熟度模型及系统评价
Enterprise’s Human Resource Maturity Model and Systemic Evaluation in the Chinese Context

作者: 王晓玲 :;

关键词: 人力资源管理成熟度模型过程质量系统评价Human Resource Management Maturity Model Process Quality Systemic Evaluation

摘要: 企业人力资源成熟度是一个循序渐进的系统过程。本文基于Hefley 人员能力成熟度模型 (P-CMM)理论,提出中国情景下企业人力资源成熟度模型,以253 家中国大陆企业样本数据和企业深度访谈资料为实证基础,运用聚类分析法和多种方差分析方法(LSD)验证企业人力资源成熟度模型的科学性和合理性,并确定了中国情景下5 级成熟度模型的评价标准。本文为企业进行人力资源成熟度自我诊断和评价提供了可以借鉴的评价标准和可操作的思路和方法。

Abstract: Corporate Human Resource Maturity is a systematic progress in gradual and orderly manner. This research brought forward the HR Maturity model which is stemmed from Hefley’s People Capability Maturity Model in the context of Chinese enterprises. The paper tested and verified the rationale of the HR Maturity model through statistical methods such as clustering analysis and variance analysis, based on the 253 empirical samples of Chinese mainland enterprise. Furthermore, the evaluation criterion has been established for 5-level Model. This research has provided an appraisal method and benchmark for Chinese Enterprises to evaluate and estimate HR Maturity.

文章引用: 王晓玲 (2011) 中国情景下企业人力资源成熟度模型及系统评价。 现代管理, 1, 105-109. doi: 10.12677/mm.2011.13019

参考文献

[1] Hefley, W.E., & Miller, S.A. People capability maturity model version 2 [URL]. http://www.sei.cmu.edu/cmm-p/, 2001.

[2] Xie Kang. Corporation’s human resource management quality and its informatization model [A]. The paper collection of Informational Economy Academy of China [C], Hua Qiao University, 2004(Ch). 谢康. 企业人力资源管理质量及其信息化模型[A]. 中国信息经济学会2004年年会论文[C], 华侨大学, 2004.

[3] Xie Kang, Wang Xiaoling, & Zhang Dongmin. Quality of cor-porate human resource management and its evaluation system [A]. The Fourth International Corporate Workshop—Human Resource Management and Development in Transfer Economy [C], Nanjing University, 2005: 253-267(Ch). 谢康, 王晓玲, 张东民. 企业人力资源管理质量及其评价体系[A]. 赵曙明, 第五届企业跨国经营国际研讨会——转型经济下的人力资源管理与开发会议论文集[C], 南京大学, 2005: 253-267.

[4] Wang Xiaoling, & Xie Kang. Review of relevant researches about of corporate human resource management quality [J]. Economy Management, 2007, 29(9): 88-92(Ch). 王晓玲, 谢康. 企业人力资源管理质量相关研究述评[J]. 经济管理, 2007, 29(9): 88-92.

[5] Wang Xiaoling, & Xie Kang. The evaluation model of process quality of corporate human resource management: the comparative and empirical study [J]. Modern Management Science, 2008, 12: 14-17(Ch). 王晓玲, 谢康. 企业人力资源管理过程质量测评模型: 基于实证的比较研究[J]. 现代管理科学, 2008, 12: 14-17.

[6] Huselid, M.A. The impact of HRM practices on turnover, productivity and corporate financial performance. Academy of Management Journal, 1995, 38(3): 635-672.

[7] Pfeffer, J. The human equation: Building profits by putting people first. Boston: Harvard Business School Press, 1998.

[8] Wright, P.M., Gardner, T.M., Moynihan, L.M., & Allen, M.R. The relationship between HR practices and firm performance: Examining, causal order. Personnel Psychology, 2005, 58: 409.

[9] Youndt, M.A., & Snell, S.A. HR configurations, intellectual capital, and organizational performance. Journal of Managerial Issues, 2004, 16(3): 337-360.

[10] Datta, D.K., Guthrie, J.P., & Wright, P.M. HRM and labor productivity: Does industry matter? Academy of Management Journal, 2005, 48(1): 135-145.

[11] Collins, C. SHRM and knowledge-creation capability: Examining the black box between HR and firm performance. University of Maryland, College Park, 2000.

[12] Colins, C.J., & Smith, K.G. Knowledge exchange and combination: The role of HR practices in the performance of high technology firm. Academy of Management Journal, 2006, 49(1): 544- 560.

分享
Top