Categorization Study on the Determination of Trademark Infringement of Keyword Advertisement in Paid Listing
Abstract: The study in this article starts from analyze the categorization of keyword advertisement in (web) search engine paid listing. Based on the standard of classification whether link entry and Search Engine Results Page (SERP) include other brand, the final appearance form of keyword advertisement service offered to Page Developers (PDS) by SERP is the following 4 types: Type 1: “Other brand included in both link entry and SERP”; Type 2: “Other brand included in SERP, not in link entry’’; Type 3: “Other brand included in link entry, not in SERP”; Type 4: “Other brand not included both in link entry and SERP”. By combing inland judicial precedent in the recent ten years, the advertisement of keyword advertiser is in justice practice further concluded the following 4 conclusions: constitutes both unfair competition and Trademark infringement, constitutes trademark infringement, constitutes unfair competition and constitution of no tort.
文章引用: 张倩瑶 , 张韬略 (2017) 竞价排名中关键词设置行为的商标侵权认定类型化研究。 争议解决， 3， 29-36. doi: 10.12677/DS.2017.33003
 黄武双. 搜索引擎服务商商标侵权责任的法理基础——兼评“大众搬场”诉“百度网络”商标侵权案[J]. 知识产权, 2008(5): 53-58.
 李岑. 竞价排名机制中搜索引擎服务商的侵权责任认定——以中外司法实践对比为视角[J]. 电子知识产权, 2015(Z1): 114-119.