2017年中国大学及学科专业评价的创新与结果分析
The Research and Innovation of Chinese University and Discipline Evaluation Results (2017)

作者: 邱均平 , 张心源 , 张扬 , 王建品 :武汉大学中国科学评价研究中心,湖北 武汉;

关键词: 大学评价中国一流大学大学排名教育评价专业评价University Evaluation Chinese First-Rate Universities University Ranking Education Evaluation Discipline Evaluation

摘要:
近日中国科学评价研究中心完成2017年中国大学及学科专业评价工作。本次评价在以往评价实践基础上,继续从四个方面进行创新:拓展评价对象、优化评价体系、完善分类评价、注重声誉影响。本次评价对全国2581所高校的竞争力进行了评价,生成617个榜单,并重点分析了中国一流大学竞争力排行榜、中国重点大学竞争力排行榜等八个榜单,研究得出以下结论:我国各地区本科教育竞争力的差异较大,排名相对稳定;一流大学排名变化较小,一般大学和民办院校发展较快;重点大学的投入和产出明显增加,国际化程度仍有待提高;各类高校应突出自身特色和学科优势,提高专业学科优秀率。

Abstract: Recently Research Center for China Science Evalution(RCCSE) has completed the evaluation of Chinese university and discipline(2017). RCCSE based on original evaluation experience bring forth new ideas in four aspects, that is, expand evaluation objects, optimize evaluation program, rationalize evaluation classification and emphasize reputation effects. The evaluation of 2017 contains totally 2581 universities inland and produces 617 lists. Meanwhile RCCSE analyzes par-ticularly 8 lists among them, including the list of Chinese first-rate univeristies, the list of national key universities, etc. There are conclusions that the rankings of undergraduate education in our country is relatively stable but exist gap among different regions. The fluctuation is small among first-rate universities but large in general universities as well as private colleges. The input and output of key universities increases significantly but internationalization remains to be improved. All kinds of colleges and universities should highlight their own characteristic and advantage, improve their discipline proficiency.

文章引用: 邱均平 , 张心源 , 张扬 , 王建品 (2016) 2017年中国大学及学科专业评价的创新与结果分析。 评价与管理, 9, 1-44. doi:

参考文献

[1] 邱均平,文庭孝等.评价学:理论•方法•实践[M].北京:科学出版社,2010.

[2] 国家中长期教育改革和发展规划纲要(2010-2020年)[M].北京:人民出版社,2010.

[3] 邱均平,李小涛,余厚强. 2014年中国大学竞争力的评价与分析[J] .高教发展与评估,2014,(3):9-18.

[4] 邱均平,马力,柴雯,欧玉芳. 2015年中国大学及学科专业评价的创新与结果[J] .中国地质大学学报(社会科学版),2015,15(2):70-82.

分享
Top