Survey and Contrastive Analysis of Metro Passengers’ Coping Behavior under Failure Situation in Suzhou and Shanghai
Abstract: To master metro passengers’ travel behavior characteristic under failure situation has great significance to make the adjustment scheme of the network operation. This paper uses stated preference questionnaire survey method to collect intention data of metro passengers’ travel behavior under failure situation in Suzhou and Shanghai, compares travel characteristics and behavioral intentions of the two cities’ metro passengers, and analyzes significant factors affecting behavior selection and its impact trend. The results show that, travel time, travel frequency and safety awareness of Shanghai’s metro passengers are significantly higher than those of Suzhou’s passengers. Choice intentions of waiting, detouring or changing a station to leave of Shanghai’s passengers are also slightly higher than those of Suzhou’s passengers. Moreover, age and educational level influence the passengers’ behavior selection obviously. This result can provide useful reference to optimize the adjustment plan of the metro network operation.
文章引用: 王志强 , 蒲桂兰 , 袁 靓 (2016) 苏州上海地铁乘客故障应对行为调查对比分析。 交通技术， 5， 185-193. doi: 10.12677/OJTT.2016.56023
 何理, 钟茂华, 史聪灵, 等. 地铁突发事件下乘客疏散行为调查研究[J]. 中国安全生产科学技术, 2009, 5(1): 53- 58.
 王世通, 杨艳红. 基于多项Logistic回归的地铁应急疏散行为影响因素分析[J]. 城市轨道交通研究, 2014(5): 73- 76.
 Huo, F.Z., Song, W.G., Liu, X.D., et al. (2014) Investigation of Human Behavior in Emergent Evacuation from an Underground Retail Store. Procedia Engineering, 71, 350-356. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2014.04.050
 陈玉宝, 郭振昌, 曾刚, 等. 基于Logit模型的航班延误后乘客行为选择研究[J]. 中国民航大学学报, 2013, 31(6): 60-64.
 dell’Olio, L., Ibeas, A., Barreda, R., et al. (2013) Passenger Behavior in Trains during Emergency Situations. Journal of Safety Research, 46, 157-166. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsr.2013.05.005
 Wen, K.-C. and Chang, S.-S. (2014) An Environmental Behavioural Study of Crowd Flow Transformation at Taipei MRT Station. Procedia Environmental Sciences, 22, 43-60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proenv.2014.11.005