The Clinical Manifestations and Treatment of Male Gonads Sex Cystitis
Abstract: Objective: To study the male sex gland sex cystitis (CG) of clinical manifestation and therapeutic effect. Methods: Retrospective analysis of 1999-2014 treatment of 22 cases of adult male con-firmed by pathology for the clinical data of gland sex cystitis. This group of 22 patients aged 27 - 74, an average 52.5 years. Clinical Performance: 18 cases symptoms of urinary frequency, urgency, urine pain 13 cases, 7 cases of hematuria, lower abdominal pain in 8 cases, 20 patients had clinical symptoms after more than two weeks anti-inflammatory therapy or repeated anti-inflammatory treatment curative effect was poor. All patients were followed up for 3 months - 48 months. Results: 22 patients with transurethral plasmakentic vaporization of bladder lesions were cutting and with bladder perfusion therapy. There are 17 patients cured or improved; 4 cases of clinical symptom have no obvious improvement; 1 case of patient’s postoperative clinical symptom is aggravating, anti-inflammatory and bladder perfusion improved after treatment for 6 months, no cases of malignant transformation. Conclusion: Male sex gland sex cystitis in multiple trend gradually, should be raised to the attention of the male sex gland sex cystitis and diagnosis level, transurethral bladder lesions electricity cut method combined the bladder perfusion treatment of small trauma. The curative effect is clear and suitable for clinical promotion.
文章引用: 刘裔道 , 蚌凌青 , 杨晓荣 , 梁 元 , 李 吉 , 陈仲斌 , 杨永刚 , 潘 隽 (2016) 男性腺性膀胱炎的临床表现与治疗。 外科， 5， 71-73. doi: 10.12677/HJS.2016.53012
 宋庆奎, 张志永. 腺性膀胱炎的诊断2228例文献分析[J]. 中国误诊学杂志, 2005, 16(11): 2087-2088.
 王立, 吴越, 张国飞, 等. 腺性膀胱炎49例早期诊断和治疗分析[J]. 中国全科医学, 2006, 9(20): 1725.
 石红林, 郝建华, 徐玉萍. 抗癌药物序贯膀胱灌注治疗腺性膀胱炎[J]. 山东医药, 1999, 39(6): 22-23.
 李健, 杨世强, 庞志宇. 经尿道激光烧灼术治疗腺性膀胱炎11例报告[J]. 临床泌尿外科杂志, 2000, 15(8): 379.
 Touffahi, M., Fredj, N., Lifi, M., et al. (2007) To Analyse Diagnosis Management and Prognosis of Florid Cystitis Glanddularis (Pseudoneop Lastic Entiry). Progrès en Urologie, 17, 968-972. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1166-7087(07)92399-4