淮北矿业许疃煤矿7煤层煤与瓦斯突出危险性临界深度分析
Analysis of Coal and Gas Outburst Critical Depth of 7 Coal Seam in Xutuan Coal Mine, Huaibei

作者: 翟建廷 :中国矿业大学资源与地球科学学院,江苏 徐州;淮北矿业(集团)有限责任公司许疃矿,安徽 淮北; 王海锋 :中国矿业大学安全工程学院,江苏 徐州; 路冠文 , 汪吉林 :中国矿业大学资源与地球科学学院,江苏 徐州;

关键词: 许疃矿瓦斯突出危险性临界深度Xutuan Coal Mine Gas Outburst Risk Critical Depth

摘要:
通过对许疃矿81、82采区及82下延采区范围内7煤层瓦斯基础参数的实验测试,获得了突出危险性评价指标值,结合研究区以往的有关数据,对煤与瓦斯突出危险性及突出临界深度进行了评价。经统计及计算,推测−620 m标高时瓦斯压力达到突出临界值,瓦斯含量接近突出临界值,实测瓦斯放散初速度最大为11 mmHg,超过了突出临界值,推算煤坚固性系数在标高低于−464 m时将达到突出临界值,研究区地质破坏带的煤体破坏类型为III~IV类。综合分析认为研究区瓦斯突出危险性临界深度应不低于−620 m标高,基于安全考虑,建议以−615 m作为生产中采用的瓦斯突出危险性临界深度。

Abstract: The outburst risk evaluation index value was obtained through the testing experiment of 7 coal seam gas basic parameters of 81, 82 mining area and 82 extension in Xutuan coal mine, the risk of coal and gas outburst and the critical depth of outburst were evaluated based on the previous data. By statistics and calculation, it was inferred that in the −620 m elevation the gas pressure would reach the critical value, the gas content was close to the critical value and the measured gas initial velocity exceeded the critical value which was 11 mmHg, in the elevation that was less than −464 m the coal sturdiness coefficient would reach the critical value and the type of coal damage in the geological failure zone of the study area was III - IV. Comprehensive analysis showed that the critical depth of gas outburst risk in the study area should be no less than the −620 m elevation, and the −615 m elevation was proposed as the critical depth of gas outburst risk which was used in the production based on safety consideration.

文章引用: 翟建廷 , 王海锋 , 路冠文 , 汪吉林 (2016) 淮北矿业许疃煤矿7煤层煤与瓦斯突出危险性临界深度分析。 矿山工程, 4, 99-105. doi: 10.12677/ME.2016.43016

参考文献

[1] Gui, X.Y. and Yu, Z.M. (2008) Research on Risk Evaluation of Mine Gas Outburst Fatalness in Xiangshui Mine. Journal of Coal Science and Engineering (China), 14, 267-271.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12404-008-0057-6

[2] Skoczylas, N. and Wierzbicki, M. (2014) Evaluation and Management of the Gas and Rock Outburst Hazard in the Light of International Legal Regulations. Archives of Mining Sciences, 59, 1119-1129.
http://dx.doi.org/10.2478/amsc-2014-0078

[3] 桂祥友, 郁钟铭. 基于灰色关联分析的瓦斯突出危险性风险评价[J]. 采矿与安全工程学报, 2006, 23(4): 464-467.

[4] 国家安全生产监督管理总局. AQ1024-2006煤与瓦斯突出矿井鉴定规范[S]. 北京: 煤炭工业出版社, 2007.

[5] 国家安全生产监督管理总局. 国家煤矿安全监察局.防治煤与瓦斯突出规定[S]. 北京: 煤炭工业出版社, 2009.

[6] Li, D. and Cheng, Y. (2014) Evaluation of Gas Control Ability of a Coal and Gas Outburst Mine. Energy Sources, Part A: Recovery, Utilization, and Environmental Effects, 36, 2401-2409.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/15567036.2011.567241

[7] Skoczylas, N. (2012) Coal Seam Methane Pressure as a Parameter Determining the Level of the Outburst Risk-Laboratory and in Situ Research/Ciśnienie Złożowe Jako Parametr Określający Stan Zagrożenia Wyrzutami Metanu I Skał-Badania Laboratoryjne I Kopalniane. Archives of Mining Sciences, 57, 861-869.
http://dx.doi.org/10.2478/v10267-012-0056-8

[8] 贾炳, 倪小明. 不同煤体结构组合的煤与瓦斯突出临界瓦斯压力[J]. 煤炭科学技术, 2012, 40(11): 69-72.

[9] 彭守建, 等. 抽采瓦斯过程中煤层瓦斯压力演化规律的物理模拟试验研究[J]. 煤炭学报, 2015, 40(3): 571-578.

[10] 闫江伟, 张小兵, 张子敏. 煤与瓦斯突出地质控制机理探讨[J]. 煤炭学报, 2013, 38(7): 1174-1178.

[11] 李希建, 林柏泉. 煤与瓦斯突出机理研究现状及分析[J]. 煤田地质与勘探, 2010, 38(1): 7-13.

[12] 文畅平. 隧道瓦斯突出危险性评价的属性识别模型与实例[J]. 煤炭学报, 2011(8): 1322-1328.

[13] 何宗礼, 孔建伟, 车云立. 平煤十一矿-850m以上己_(16,17)煤层突出危险性评价[J]. 中州煤炭, 2009(6): 88-90, 100.

[14] 蔡毅, 蒲家全, 李秋林. 煤层突出危险性鉴定指标分析[J]. 矿业安全与环保, 2011, 38(4): 87-88, 92.

[15] 煤炭工业部. 防治煤与瓦斯突出细则[S]. 北京: 煤炭工业出版社, 1988.

分享
Top