论工伤待遇“私了”协议的法律效力
Discussion on the Legal Validity of the Private Settlement Agreements for Work-Related Injuries

作者: 张 强 :曲阜师范大学大学法学院,山东 日照 ;

关键词: 工伤私了协议效力认定赔偿Occupational Injury Private Settlement Agreements Effectiveness Identification Compensation

摘要:
近年来,劳动者在工作中发生事故后,与用人单位自行签订工伤“私了”协议的现象越来越多。一方面劳动者能够尽快拿到补偿;另一方面双方可以避免过多纠缠,尽快息事宁人。但是这种私下达成的协议,劳动者得到的赔偿往往低于法定赔偿数额,不能够很好地保护本身的切实利益,所以不少劳动者在签订该协议后反悔诉至法院,但是其效力往往受到法律的质疑。关于工伤“私了”协议的效力该如何认定,在实际中有比较大的分歧。

Abstract: In recent years, there has been a rise in private settlement of work-related injuries between workers and employers. On the one hand, the workers can get compensation promptly; on the other hand, both parties can avoid excessive dispute and make quick and peaceful settlement of the matter. But the sum of compensation the workers get through private settlement is usually much lower than that stipulated by law; therefore private settlement often fails to protect the workers’ interests effectively. As a result, many workers will file lawsuits in court after they sign agreements of private settlement. The effect of private settlement agreements is hence challenged by law, and there exists great controversy on the determination of the effect of private settlement agreements for work-related injuries in juridical practice.

文章引用: 张 强 (2016) 论工伤待遇“私了”协议的法律效力。 争议解决, 2, 19-24. doi: 10.12677/DS.2016.22004

参考文献

[1] 毛磊. 工伤赔偿争议能否和解或调解[J]. 中国社会保障, 2015(7): 56.

[2] 刘林强. 从一则案例析工伤私了协议的相关法律问题[J]. 金田期刊, 2015(12): 32.

[3] 姜颖, 主编. 劳动争议教程[M]. 北京: 法律出版社, 2003.

[4] 王霞. 试论私了的工伤协议是否具有法律效力[J]. 劳动保障世界, 2010(10): 64.

[5] 栾居沪, 冯友飞. 工伤私了协议的效力判断[J]. 2008(5): 59.

[6] 叶明欣. 如何判断工伤赔偿协议的效力[J]. 劳动保护期刊, 2013(10): 48-50.

[7] 王德山. 论情势变更制度的适用要件[J]. 法学杂志, 2008(1): 57-60.

[8] 韦利. 工伤私了协议效力如何判定[J]. 中国劳动保障报, 2014(8): 1.

分享
Top