北京市各高校图书馆资源使用效率评估
Use Efficiency Evaluation of the University Library Resources in Beijing

作者: 闵素芹 , 佟志莹 * , 陈 昕 :中国传媒大学理学院,北京;

关键词: 图书馆资源效率评估变异系数法DEA模型Library Resources Use Efficiency Evaluation The Variation Coefficient Method DEA Model

摘要:
为探索北京市各高校图书馆资源使用效率现状,本文通过网络和实地调研等方式采集数据,先使用变异系数法对使用者满意度进行研究分析,得出图书馆使用情况及满意度排名靠前的学校依次为中央财经大学、北京外国语大学和北京理工大学;大部分高校的得分在60~75分之间,且在效用性方面的得分相对较低。以各高校图书馆硬件配置数据作为投入指标,满意度评分的二层指标作为产出指标,对研究的十所学校利用DEA模型测算其图书馆资源使用效率,其中DEA强有效的有北京外国语大学和中央财经大学。以中国传媒大学图书馆为例,其DEA值仅为0.609,说明图书馆资源使用情况存在不合理的地方,结合模型得出的松弛变量和目标值的计算可以得出阅览座位应该增加原来的30.2%等。

Abstract: To explore the current situation of the availability of the university library resources in Beijing, we do the data collection through the Internet and field investigation, first using the variation coefficient method to analyze the data of the satisfaction of audiences. It is concluded that the Central University of Finance and Economics, Beijing Foreign Studies University and Beijing Insti-tute of Technology come out top. Most of the colleges and universities score between 60 and 75 points, and the utility score is relatively low. Taking the hardware configuration of the university library as input indicators and satisfaction score index on the second floor as output indicator, we measured the using efficiency of library resources by DEA model. Among the results, Beijing For-eign Studies University and Central University of Finance and Economics are at the top of all. As for the library of Communication University of China, the value of DEA is only 0.609, means that the usage of the library resource is not reasonable. Combined with the slack variables and the calcula-tion of the target from the model, it can be concluded that reading seat should be increased 30.2%, etc.

文章引用: 闵素芹 , 佟志莹 , 陈 昕 (2016) 北京市各高校图书馆资源使用效率评估。 社会科学前沿, 5, 341-348. doi: 10.12677/ASS.2016.52047

参考文献

[1] 范红霞, 刘泽隆. 高校图书馆资源使用效率测定的DEA模型分析[J]. 情报杂志, 2008, 27(4): 157-158.

[2] 魏力更. 高校图书馆电子资源的利用与评价[J]. 图书馆学研究, 2006(7): 64-66.

[3] 蒲筱哥, 乔亚铭, 胡亚敏. 基于网络分析法的高校图书馆电子资源服务绩效评价模型及实证研究[J]. 大学图书馆学报, 2014, 32(4): 41-49.

分享
Top