组织变革的经济和模仿因素影响分析:基于国企改制的实证研究
The Role of Economic and Mimetic Forces in Organizational Change: A Study of China’s State-Owned Enterprises

作者: 秦令华 :浙江师范大学经济管理学院,浙江 金华;

关键词: 组织变革经济因素模仿国企改制Organizational Change Economic Forces Mimetic Pressure SOE Transformation

摘要:

影响组织变革的因素既有经济方面的也有制度方面的,研究制度因素对变革的影响不仅有助于对变革的理解,也有利于进一步充实制度主义理论。本文使用20012006年国企面板数据分析了经济因素(改制前的企业绩效和组织冗余)和制度因素中模仿(同地区累积改制率)对国企首次改制可能性的影响。考虑到我国各地区制度环境稳定性的不同,进一步检验了制度环境的稳定性对模仿机制的调节作用。结果发现,改制前的企业绩效和组织冗余对改制的可能性有一定的负向影响,而同地区累积改制率有正向的影响。此外,制度环境的稳定性会减弱同地区累积改制率对改制的作用。可见,结合经济因素和制度因素或许可以更好地解释组织变革的动因。

Institutional theorists have emphasized the importance of institutional factors in causing organizational change apart from economic factors. They proposed that mimetic change is an organizational response to uncertainty and it is likely to be even more common during institutional up- heaval. The transformation of the SOE (State-Owned Enterprise) is a very complicated organizational change. This paper examines the role of economic forces and mimetic forces in promoting SOE transformation among industrial enterprises above designated size from 2001 to 2006. Results support the view that SOE transformation depends on both economic forces (organizational slack and prior performance) and mimetic force (regional accumulative transformation rate). Further result indicates that regional degree of marketization mediates the relationship between regional accumulative transformation rate and SOE transformation.



Abstract:



Abstract:

文章引用: 秦令华 (2016) 组织变革的经济和模仿因素影响分析:基于国企改制的实证研究。 管理科学与工程, 5, 12-15. doi: 10.12677/MSE.2016.51B003

参考文献

[1] Barnett, W.P. and Carroll, G.R. (1995) Modeling Internal Organizational Change. Annual Review of Sociology, 21, 217-236. http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev.so.21.080195.001245

[2] Greenwood, R. and Hinings, C.R. (1996) Un-derstanding Radical Organizational Change: Bringing Together the Old and the New Institutionalism. The Academy of Management Review, 21, 1022-1054.

[3] D’Aunno, T., Succi, M. and Alexander, J.A. (2000) The Role of Institutional and Market Forces in Divergent Organizational Change. Administrative Science Quarterly, 45, 679-703. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2667016

[4] Miller, D. and Chen, M.J. (1994) Sources and Consequences of Competitive Inertia: A Study of the US. Airline Industry. Administrative Science Quarterly, 39, 1-23. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2393492

[5] Cyert, R.M. and March, J.G. (1963) A Behavioral Theory of the Firm. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs.

[6] Kraatz, M.S. and Zajac, E.J. (2001) How Organizational Resources Affect Strategic Change and Performance in Turbulent Environments: Theory and Evidence. Organization Science, 12, 632-657. http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/orsc.12.5.632.10088

[7] 刘小玄, 刘芍佳. 国有企业改制重组调查研究报告. http://www.usc.cuhk.edu.hk/webmanager/wkfiles/5449_1_paper.doc

[8] Scott, W.R. (1995) Institutions and Organ-izations, Foundations for Organizational Science. Sage, Beverly Hills.

[9] Dimaggio, P. and Powell, W. (1983) The Iron Cage Revisited: Institutional Isomorphism and Collective Rationality. American Sociological Review, 48, 147-160. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2095101

[10] 樊纲, 王小鲁, 朱恒鹏. 中国市场化指数——各地区市场化相对进程2006年度报告[M]. 北京: 经济科学出版社, 2006.

分享
Top