新教伦理与千禧年主义:现代性何以可能?
The Protestant Ethic and the Millenarianism: The Possibility of Modernity
作者: 王宏宇 :中央民族大学民族学与社会学学院,北京;
关键词: 现代性; 韦伯; 新教伦理; 曼海姆; 千禧年主义; Modernity; Marx Weber; Protestant Ethic; Mannheim; Millenarianism
摘要:Abstract: There are amounts of zigzag motion stages appearing as social chaos and confusions of mind in the long history. It is difficult for the determination of the specific time point, such as the discussion about the occurrence of modernity or modern revolution inevitably will neglect the role of pioneer. So today we mainly focus on discussing the motive forces of the modern revolutionary rather than the motor process, namely the path of the beginning of modernity. We compare the Reformation by the middle class discussed by Marx Weber with the Millenarian Movement, led by Thomas Muntzer and discussed by Mannheim on juxtaposition, expecting to get some interpretation about the pioneers of modern revolution, and at the same time trying to put the thinking directions into other political field and verify its effectiveness.
文章引用: 王宏宇 (2016) 新教伦理与千禧年主义:现代性何以可能?。 现代人类学, 4, 1-6. doi: 10.12677/MA.2016.41001
参考文献
[1] [德]卡尔•曼海姆, 著. 意识形态与乌托邦[M]. 李步楼, 等, 译. 北京: 商务印书馆, 2014: 255.
[2] 张琳. 现代性的信仰困境与信仰塑造[D]: [博士学位论文]. 上海: 复旦大学, 2012.
[3] 汪民安. 现代性基本读本(上) [M]. 北京: 河南大学出版社, 2005: 120.
[4] [德]尤尔根•哈贝马斯, 著. 现代性的哲学话语[M]. 曹卫东, 译. 上海: 上海人民出版社, 2004: 前言.
[5] [德]尤尔根•哈贝马斯, 著. 现代性的哲学话语[M]. 曹卫东, 译. 上海: 上海人民出版社, 2004: 5.
[6] [英]安东尼•吉登斯, 著. 现代性与自我认同[M]. 赵旭东, 等, 译. 北京: 三联出版社, 1998: 14.
[7] 苏国勋. 理性化及其限制——韦伯思想引论[M]. 上海: 上海人民出版社, 1988: 122.
[8] [德]马克斯•韦伯, 著. 新教伦理与资本主义精神[M]. 康乐, 译. 桂林: 广西师范大学出版社, 2005: 82.
[9] [德]卡尔•曼海姆, 著. 意识形态与乌托邦[M]. 李步楼, 等, 译. 北京: 商务印书馆, 2014: 254.
[10] [德]卡尔•曼海姆, 著. 意识形态与乌托邦[M]. 李步楼, 等, 译. 北京: 商务印书馆, 2014: 256.
[11] [德]卡尔•曼海姆, 著. 意识形态与乌托邦[M]. 李步楼, 等, 译. 北京: 商务印书馆, 2014: 260.
[12] [德]卡尔•曼海姆, 著. 意识形态与乌托邦[M]. 李步楼, 等, 译. 北京: 商务印书馆, 2014: 271.
[13] [德]卡尔•曼海姆, 著. 意识形态与乌托邦[M]. 李步楼, 等, 译. 北京: 商务印书馆, 2014: 268.
[14] [德]马克斯•韦伯, 著. 学术与政治[M]. 钱永祥, 译. 桂林: 广西师范大学出版社, 2010: 45.