中文版Rosenberg积极自尊量表的信效度检验
The Reliability and Validity of the Chinese Version of the Revised-Positive Version of Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale

作者: 陈菲菲 , 毕重增 :西南大学心理学部,重庆; 韩梦霏 :中国科学院心理研究所,北京;

关键词: 中文版Rosenberg积极自尊量表信度效度Revised-Positive version of Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale Reliability Validity

摘要: 本研究以1166名高中生、大学生、成人及现役军人组成的6个样本为调查对象,采用问卷调查法收集数据,通过项目区分度、量表信度、效度的检验考察中文版Rosenberg积极自尊量表在中国人群中的适用情况。结果显示:中文版Rosenberg积极自尊量表在各个样本上的项目区分度良好;量表在大学生、成人、现役军人样本中的Cronbach α系数在0.83 - 0.89之间,高中生样本间隔4周的重测信度系数为0.76;因素分析结果表明,量表在大学生、成人、现役军人样本上的方差贡献率在39.67%~51.21%之间,结构效度良好。结果表明,中文版Rosenberg积极自尊量表具有良好的信效度。

Abstract: This study was to examine the reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the Revised-posi- tive version of Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale. Item discrimination, reliability and validity of the scale were adopted to analyze the data from 6 samples of 1166 including high school students, college students, adults and servicemen. Results shown that discrimination indices of items were good in different samples; Internal consistency reliability coefficient of the scale was 0.80 – 0.89 in samples of college students, adults and servicemen and test-retest reliability coefficient was 0.76 in sample of high school students; exploratory factor analysis indicated that 39.67% - 51.21% of the variance from samples of college students, adults and servicemen, which showed the scale had a good struc-tural validity. These findings suggested the Chinese version of the Revised-positive version of Ro-senberg Self-Esteem Scale had good reliability and validity.

文章引用: 陈菲菲 , 毕重增 , 韩梦霏 (2015) 中文版Rosenberg积极自尊量表的信效度检验。 心理学进展, 5, 531-535. doi: 10.12677/AP.2015.59068

参考文献

[1] 段文杰, 白羽, 何敏贤, 唐小晴(2012). 跨文化研究中测量工具等价性操作流程初探: 我们从积极心理学中学到了什么? 心理学进展, 2期, 78-84.

[2] 田录梅(2006). Rosenberg (1965)自尊量表中文版的美中不足.心理学探新, 2期, 88-91.

[3] 王孟成, 蔡炳光, 吴艳, 戴晓阳(2010). 项目表述方法对中文Rosenberg自尊量表因子结构的影响. 心理学探新, 3期, 63-68.

[4] Boduszek, D., Hyland, P., Dhingra, K., & Mallett, J. (2013). The factor structure and composite reliability of the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale among ex-prisoners. Personality and Individual Differences, 55, 877-881.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2013.07.014

[5] Greenberger, E., Chen, C. S., Dmitrieva, J., & Farruggia, S. P. (2003). Item-wording and the dimensionality of the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale: Do they matter? Personality and Indi-vidual Differences, 35, 1241-1254.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0191-8869(02)00331-8

[6] Marsh, H. W., Scalas, L. F., & Nagengast, B. (2010). Longi-tudinal tests of competing factor structures for the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale: Traits, ephemeral artifacts, and stable response styles. Psychological Assessment, 22, 366-381.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0019225

[7] Rosenberg, M. (1965). Society and the adolescent self-image. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

[8] Schmitt, D. P., & Allik, J. (2005). Simultaneous administration of the Rosenberg self-esteem scale in 53 nations: Exploring the universal and culture-specific features of global self-esteem. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89, 623- 642.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.89.4.623

[9] Supple, A. J., Su, J. N., Plunkett, S. W., Peterson, G. W., & Bush, K. R. (2013). Factor structure of the Rosenberg Self-Es- teem Scale. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 44, 748-764.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0022022112468942

[10] Urbán, R., Szigeti, R., Kökönyei, G., & Demetrovics, Z. (2014). Global self-esteem and method effects: Competing factor structures, longitudinal invariance, and response styles in adolescents. Behavior Research Methods, 46, 488-498.
http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/s13428-013-0391-5

分享
Top