个股特质流动性风险与资产定价—基于中国A股市场的实证研究
Idiosyncratic Liquidity Risk and Asset Pricing—An Empirical Research Based on Data of China’s Stock Market

作者: 梁建峰 , 孟令昊 :中山大学岭南(大学)学院,广东 广州;

关键词: 特质流动性风险特质流动性波动率市场模型资产定价Idiosyncratic Liquidity Risk Idiosyncratic Volatility of Liquidity Market Model Asset Pricing

摘要:
传统观点认为通过充分分散投资,资产的个股特质流动性风险可被完全对冲,因此资产定价研究主要探讨系统流动性风险溢价。然而,最新文献成果验证了美国股票市场个股特质流动性风险与股票价格的显著相关关系,令个股特质流动性风险因子受到学术关注。本文通过横截面分析和时间序列回归研究中国A股市场个股特质流动性风险的定价作用。结果显示中国A股市场特质流动性波动率是相对独立的风险因子且与资产收益率呈显著正相关;经典定价模型加入个股特质流动性风险因子后对中国A股市场的解释力和资产定价效率均得到提高。

Abstract: It is well accepted that in a well-diversified portfolio, only systematic liquidity risk affects asset returns. However, recent research finds out that idiosyncratic liquidity risk is positively priced in the cross-section of stock returns in US stock market. This paper defines idiosyncratic volatility of liquidity as a proxy for idiosyncratic liquidity risk, and investigates the effect of idiosyncratic vo-latility of liquidity on asset pricing based on data of China’s stock market. It turns out that in China’s stock market, idiosyncratic volatility of liquidity is a relatively independent variable, and it presents significant and stable positive correlation with the stock return.

文章引用: 梁建峰 , 孟令昊 (2015) 个股特质流动性风险与资产定价—基于中国A股市场的实证研究。 金融, 5, 47-56. doi: 10.12677/FIN.2015.53007

参考文献

[1] Chordia, T., Roll, R. and Subrahmanyam, A. (2000) Commonality in liquidity. Journal of Financial Economics, 56, 3-28. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0304-405X(99)00057-4

[2] Chordia, T., Subrahmanyam, A. and Anshuman, V. (2001) Trading activity and expected stock returns. Journal of Financial Economics, 59, 3-32. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0304-405X(00)00080-5

[3] Jones, C.M. (2002) A century of stock market liquidity and trading costs. Working Paper, Columbia University.

[4] Pastor, L. and Stambaugh, R. (2003) Liquidity risk and ex-pected stock returns. Journal of Political Economy, 111, 642- 685. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/374184

[5] Bekaert, G., Harvey, C.R. and Lundblad, C. (2007) Liquidity and expected returns: Lessons from emerging markets. Review of Fi-nancial Studies, 20, 1783-1831. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/rfs/hhm030

[6] Acharya, V.V. and Pedersen, L.H. (2005) Asset pricing with liquidity risk. Journal of Financial Economics, 77, 375- 410. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2004.06.007

[7] 宋逢明, 谭慧 (2005) 订单驱动型市场的系统流动性: 一个基于中国股市的实证研究. 财经论丛(浙江财经学院学报), 3, 63-69.

[8] 罗登跃, 王春峰, 房振明, 韩冬 (2005) 基于时间序列的上海股市系统风险、流动性风险溢价实证研究. 系统工程, 7, 48-54.

[9] 麦元勋 (2006) 基于流动性Beta系数的我国股市流动性风险实证研究. 现代管理科学, 6, 117-119.

[10] 尹海员, 李忠民 (2011) 系统流动性、个股流动性与资产定价——基于我国沪市上市公司的实证研究. 经济经纬, 6, 151-155.

[11] Brown, D.B., Carlin, B.I. and Lobo, M.S. (2010) Optimal portfolio liquidation with distress risk. Management Science, 56, 1997-2014. http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1100.1235

[12] Akbas, F., Armstrong, W.J. and Petkova, R. (2011) Idiosyncratic volatility of liquidity and expected stock returns. Working Paper.

[13] Amihud, Y. (2002) Illiquidity and stock returns: Cross-section and time-series effects. Journal of Financial Markets, 5, 31-56. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1386-4181(01)00024-6

[14] Carhart, M.M. (1997) On persistence in mutual fund perfor-mance. Journal of Finance, 52, 57-82. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.1997.tb03808.x

分享
Top