沁水盆地与鄂尔多斯盆地上古生界泥页岩储层对比分析
Mud Shale Reservoir Comparison of the Upper Paleozoic in Qinshui Basin and Erdos Basin

作者: 高 丹 , 高全芳 :中国地质大学(北京)能源学院,北京;

关键词: 沁水盆地鄂尔多斯盆地泥页岩储层对比Qinshui Basin Erdos Basin Mud Shale Reservoir Comparison

摘要:
沁水盆地是我国重要的含煤盆地之一,鄂尔多斯盆地是我国重要的含油气盆地。随着中国经济的快速发展,对油气资源的需求越来越高,页岩气是未来重要的补充能源,这两个盆地均发育多套泥页岩层,其中山西组与太原组等均有可能形成页岩气藏,因此对这两个盆地泥页岩储层进行对比研究具有重要意义。笔者重点关注了泥页岩评价指标中的总有机碳、有机质类型和成熟度、泥页岩中脆性矿物含量及孔渗方面和微孔隙等的特征,通过有机地球化学及泥页岩储层特征的对比,最终得出鄂尔多斯盆地山西组及太原组泥页岩储层均优于沁水盆地,为以后的勘探开发提供了重要参考。

Abstract: Qinshui basin is one of the important coal basin in China; Erdos basin is an important oil and gas basin in China. With the rapid development of Chinese economy, demand for oil and gas resources is much higher. Shale gas is an important additional energy in the future. The two basins develop many sets of shale bed, of which Shanxi group and Taiyuan group may form shale gas reservoirs, so it is of great significance to make a comparative study of the two basin shale reservoirs. The author focuses on Total Organic Carbon, organic matter types and maturity, the characteristics of brittle mineral content and porosity, permeability and micropores in the evaluation of mud shale, through the comparison of organic geochemistry and shale reservoir characteristics, and finally obtains the mud shale reservoirs of Shanxi formation and Taiyuan formation in Erdos basin are better than which in Qinshui basin, which provides an important reference for the following exploration and development.

文章引用: 高 丹 , 高全芳 (2015) 沁水盆地与鄂尔多斯盆地上古生界泥页岩储层对比分析。 可持续能源, 5, 24-32. doi: 10.12677/SE.2015.53004

参考文献

[1] 侯读杰, 包书景, 毛小平, 等 (2012) 页岩气资源潜力评价的几个关键问题讨论. 地球科学与环境学报, 3, 7-16.

[2] 顾娇杨, 叶建平, 房超, 邵龙义 (2011) 沁水盆地页岩气资源前景展望. 2011年煤层气学术研讨会论文集, 中国煤炭学会煤层气专业委员会、中国石油学会石油地质专业委员会, 7.

[3] 陈燕萍, 黄文辉, 陆小霞, 龚猛, 刘贝 (2013) 沁水盆地海陆交互相页岩气成藏条件分析. 资源与产业, 3, 68-72.

[4] 郭少斌, 郑红梅, 黄家国 (2014) 鄂尔多斯盆地上古生界非常规天然气综合勘探前景. 地质科技情报, 6, 69-77.

[5] 王辛 (2012) 鄂尔多斯盆地富县地区长7段页岩储层评价. 成都理工大学, 成都.

[6] 付金华, 郭少斌, 刘新社, 王义刚 (2013) 鄂尔多斯盆地上古生界山西组页岩气成藏条件及勘探潜力. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2, 382-389.

[7] 郭少斌, 王义刚 (2013) 鄂尔多斯盆地石炭系本溪组页岩气成藏条件及勘探潜力. 石油学报, 3, 445-452.

[8] 郭少斌, 赵可英 (2014) 鄂尔多斯盆地上古生界泥页岩储层含气性影响因素及储层评价. 石油实验地质, 6, 678- 691.

[9] 王传刚, 王毅, 许化政, 等 (2009) 论鄂尔多斯盆地下古生界烃源岩的成藏演化特征. 石油学报, 30, 38-45.

[10] Curtis, J.B. (2002) Fractured shale gas systems. AAPG Bulletin, 11, 1921-1938.

[11] Ross, D.J.K. (2007) Shale gas potential of the Lower Jurassic Gordondale Member, northeastern British Columbia, Canada. Bulletin of Canadian Petroleum Geology, 55, 51-75.

[12] 蒲泊伶, 蒋有录, 王毅, 等 (2010) 四川盆地下志留统龙马溪组页岩气成藏条件及有利地区分析. 石油学报, 31, 225-230.

[13] 吉利明, 邱军利, 夏燕青, 等 (2012) 常见粘土矿物电镜扫描微孔隙特征与甲烷吸附性. 石油学报, 33, 249-256.

[14] 焦淑静, 韩辉, 翁庆萍, 杨峰, 姜大强, 崔立山 (2012) 页岩孔隙结构扫描电镜分析方法研究. 电子显微学报, 5, 432-436.

[15] Loucks, R.G., Reed, R.M., Ruppel, S.C., et al. (2009) Morphology, genesis and distribution of nanometer-scale pores in siliceous mudstone of the Missis-sippian Barnett Shales. Journal of Sedimentary Researsh, 79, 848-861.

分享
Top