A Review on Research of Fairness Concerns in Economic Distribution
作者: 曹智鹏 ：西南大学心理学部，重庆;
Abstract: The hypothesis of rational economic man in classical economics assumes that people always want to maximize their gains and minimize their losses. However, the behavioral results of classical paradigms in behavioral economics like Ultimatum Game and Dictator Game have suggested that people's behaviors in economic distribution are not in line with the rational assumption, and they are likely to make irrational choices. People tend to avoid unfairness in distribution, and even pu-nish unfairness proposers at the cost of their benefits. The present paper reviews the use of Ulti-matum Game and Dictator Game in the psychology and neuroscience studies and relevant results.
文章引用: 曹智鹏 (2015) 经济分配中公平因素的心理学研究现状评述。 心理学进展， 5， 216-220. doi: 10.12677/AP.2015.54030
 Boksem, M. A., & De Cremer, D. (2010). Fairness concerns predict medial frontal negativity amplitude in ultimatum bar-gaining. Social Neuroscience, 5, 118-128.
 Brune, M., Scheele, D., Heinisch, C., Tas, C., Wischniewski, J., & Gun-turkun, O. (2012). Empathy moderates the effect of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation of the right dorsolateral prefrontal cortex on costly punishment. PLoS ONE, 7, e44747.
 de Haan, M., & Thomas, K. M. (2002). Applications of ERP and fMRI techniques to developmental science. Developmental Science, 5, 335-343.
 De Neys, W., Novitskiy, N., Geeraerts, L., Ramautar, J., & Wagemans, J. (2011). Cognitive control and individual differences in economic ultimatum decision-making. PLoS ONE, 6, e27107.
 Declerck, C. H., Kiyonari, T., & Boone, C. (2009). Why do responders reject unequal offers in the ultimatum game? An experimental study on the role of perceiving interdependence. Journal of Economic Psychology, 30, 335-343.
 Eckel, C. C., & Grossman, P. J. (1996). Altruism in anonymous dictator games. Games and Economic Behavior, 16, 181- 191.
 Fehr, E., & Schmidt, K. M. (1999). A theory of fairness, competition, and cooperation. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 114, 817-868.
 Forsythe, R., Horowitz, J. L., Savin, N. E., & Sefton, M. (1994). Fairness in simple bargaining experiments. Games and Economic Behavior, 6, 347-369.
 Güth, W., Schmittberger, R., & Schwarze, B. (1982). An experimental analysis of ultimatum bargaining. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 3, 367-388.
 Henrich, J., Boyd, R., Bowles, S., Camerer, C., Fehr, E., Gintis, H., & Tracer, D. (2005). “Economic man” in cross-cultural perspective: Behavioral experiments in 15 small-scale societies. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 28, 795-855.
 Hsu, M., Anen, C., & Quartz, S. R. (2008). The right and the good: Distributive justice and neural encoding of equity and efficiency. Science, 320, 1092-1095.
 Knoch, D., Pascual-Leone, A., Meyer, K., Treyer, V., & Fehr, E. (2006). Diminishing reciprocal fairness by disrupting the right prefrontal cortex. Science, 314, 829-832.
 McCabe, K. A. (2008). Neuroeconomics and the Economic Sciences. Economics and Philosophy, 24, 345-368.
 Servátka, M. (2010). Does generosity generate generosity? An experimental study of reputation effects in a dictator game. The Journal of Socio-Economics, 39, 11-17.
 Shupp, R., Schmitt, P., & Swope, K. (2006). On the role of the hostage in ultimatum bargaining games. The Journal of Socio-Economics, 35, 399-411.
 Straub, P. G., & Murnighan, J. K. (1995). An experimental investigation of ultimatum games: Information, fairness, expectations, and lowest acceptable offers. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 27, 345-364.
 Tabibnia, G., Satpute, A. B., & Lieberman, M. D. (2008). The sunny side of fairness—Preference for fairness activates reward circuitry (and disregarding unfairness activates self-control circuitry). Psychological Science, 19, 339-347.
 Tan, H. B., & Forgas, J. P. (2010). When happiness makes us selfish, but sadness makes us fair: Affective influences on interpersonal strategies in the dictator game. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 46, 571-576.
 Wu, Y., Hu, J., van Dijk, E., Leliveld, M. C., & Zhou, X. (2012). Brain activity in fairness consideration during asset distribution: Does the initial ownership play a role? PLoS ONE, 7, e39627.
 Wu, Y., Leliveld, M. C., & Zhou, X. (2011). Social distance modulates recipient’s fairness consideration in the dictator game: An ERP study. Biological Psychology, 88, 253-262.
 Wu, Y., Zhou, Y., van Dijk, E., Leliveld, M. C., & Zhou, X. (2011). Social comparison affects brain responses to fairness in asset division: An ERP study with the ultimatum game. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 5, 131.