系统论视角的大学英语教育绩效评估
College English Education Performance Evaluation Based on Systems Theory

作者: 段惠琼 :奥克兰大学教育学院,奥克兰;南昌航空大学外国语学院,南昌; 劳伦斯.张 :奥克兰大学教育学院,奥克兰; 冯凯 :南昌航空大学飞行器学院,南昌;

关键词: 大学教育绩效评估系统论(Draft 2008)College Education Performance Evaluation Systems Theory (Draft 2008)

摘要:

伴随高教规模扩大,各校承受着日益增大的财政压力,家长和学生承担着学费攀升带来的沉重经济负担。如何评价一所大学履行教育使命的能力成为知识经济时代必须考虑的问题。高校管理部门、家长和学生迫切希望了解目前的投入与产出是否相称。文章以某省高校为样本,以Draft(2008)系统论为理论框架,并据此确定绩效评估指标;接着进行数据编程,分析数据结果,得出当前非有效决策单元和有效决策单元。在分析有效决策单元和非有效单元的产生原因后,提出了解决非有效决策单元的建议。本评估目的不仅限于将被评估高校归为有效和非有效决策单元,更希望用评估发现问题,提出相应解决办法,为我国高校进一步改进工作提高科学合理依据,促进高校更加健康高效率发展。

Abstract:

Abstract: With the expanding scale of higher education, colleges and universities are under enormous finan-cial pressure; parents and students have to bear a heavy economic burden caused by rising tuition. How to evaluate the ability to fulfill the mission of a university in the knowledge economy era has become an urgent issue, which needs to be carefully considered. University administrators, parents and students are eager to know whether the current input and output match or not. In this article, samples of provincial Colleges and Universities are selected as research subjects, Draft’s (2008) Systems Theory is used as the theoretical framework for determining our evaluation indexes. Fol-lowed by data programming, and according to the results obtained, current non-effective deci-sion-making units and effective decision making units are located. Causes of non-effective units are analyzed. Ideas and countermeasures to solve the non-effective decision-making units are proposed. The purpose of this evaluation is not limited to simply evaluate non-effective and effective decision-units among these universities. It is to discover problems with university education as-sessment, and propose appropriate solutions for our universities to further improve their work on scientific and rational basis. It is our hope that colleges and universities are able to have a more healthy and higher efficient development.

文章引用: 段惠琼 , 劳伦斯.张 , 冯凯 (2014) 系统论视角的大学英语教育绩效评估。 现代管理, 4, 13-20. doi: 10.12677/MM.2014.42003

参考文献

[1] Abbott, M. and Doucouliagos, C. (2003) The efficiency of Australian universities: A data envelopment analysis. Economics of Education Review, 22, 89-97.

[2] 段惠琼 (2011) 江西高校现代教育技术发展中的问题与对策. 中国报业, 5, 110-111.

[3] Hogg, R.V. and Hogg, M.C. (1995) Continuous quality improvement in higher education. International Statistical Review, 1, 35-48.

[4] Wilson, R. (1991) Undergraduates at large universities found to be increasingly dissatisfied. The Chronicle of Higher Education, 17, A37-A38.

[5] Olasunkanmi, A. and Mabel, O. (2012) An input-output analysis of public and private secondary schools in Lagos. Nigeria International Journal of Humanities and Social Science, 18, 85-96.

[6] 吕炜, 王伟同 (2007) 我国公共教育支出绩效考评指标体系构建研究——基于绩效内涵和教育支出过程特性的构建思路. 财政研究, 8, 24-29.

[7] 杜兴洋, 田进 (2007) 公共教育支出绩效评价的研究现状. 财政研究, 1, 9-14.

[8] 任小帅, 陈明选 (2008) 提高大学英语学习网站教育绩效的理论思考. 江南大学学报(教育科学版), 3, 63-66.

[9] 唐志勇 (2008) 现代教育技术在小学英语教学应用绩效研究. 硕士论文, 四川师范大学, 成都.

[10] 黄朝峰 (2005) 基于模糊DEA的高校办学效益评价方法及应用研究. 硕士论文, 国防科学技术大学, 长沙.

[11] Draft, R.L. (2008) New era of management. Thompson Corporation, USA.

[12] 黄朝峰 (2003) 高教评估中人才产出数量的计算. 中国高等教育评估, 1, 27-29.

[13] 姜春林, 王友强 (2009) 985高校管理学科投入产出效率评价实证研究. 科技进步与对策, 22, 193-196.

[14] Charnes, A., Cooper, W. and Rhodes, E. (1978) Measuring the efficiency of decision-making units. European Journal of Operational Research, 2, 429-444.

[15] Banker, R.D., Charnes, R.F. and Cooper, W.W. (1984) Some models for estimating technical and scale inefficiencies in data envelopment analysis. Management Science, 30, 1078-1092.

[16] 魏权龄 (1988) 评价相对有效性的DEA方法. 中国人民大学出版社, 北京.

[17] 马占新 (2002) 数据包络分析方法的研究进展. 系统工程与电子技术, 24, 33-37.

[18] Stufflebeam, D.L., McCormick, C.-H., Brinkerhoff, R.-O. and Nelson, C.-O. (2012) Conducting educational needs assessments. Evaluation in Education and Human Services, Springer.

分享
Top