产业高阶人才战略规划培训框架——建构价值共创链
Executive Strategy Planning Training Framework——An Industrial Value Co-Creation Perspective

作者: 李 智 :IBM;国立中山大学;

关键词: 产业跨领域人才培训价值共创服务科学管理暨工程企业架构Industrial Multi-Disciplinary Training Value Co-Creation Service Science Management and Engineering Enterprise Architecture

摘要:
两岸经济均已迈入服务创新驱动发展之全新阶段,欲加速新兴产业发展与促进产业升级转型,亟需面向价值服务结合科技理论与营运管理跨领域人才协力参与,方能洞悉产业发展所面临多元挑战与采取因应之道。本文具体指出跨领域高阶人才培训及养成方向,以“企业架构”为战略实践方法,并提出一套战略实践总体观,营造产业价值共创有利环境,落实服务主导型经济,期望对产业发展主管机关战略拟定与实践有所帮助。
>Both Mainland China and Taiwan have entered a new service innovation driven economic era. In order to pursue the success of development and optimization to the emerging industries, a multi-disciplinary professional role with service-dominant logic, technological, and management is required to identify the appropriate strategies and respond to the facing challenges. This paper shows the training objectives as well as the training content of such a multi-disciplinary professional role for executives. By presenting tangible reference models including industry value co-creation and balanced view of strategy using Enterprise Architecture as the tool of strategy planning and its realization, this paper demonstrates the feasible approaches and expects to make contribution to the industry development related authorities.

文章引用: 李 智 (2013) 产业高阶人才战略规划培训框架——建构价值共创链。 管理科学与工程, 2, 77-83. doi: 10.12677/MSE.2013.24013

参考文献

[1] 中国共产党第十七届中央委员会 (2010) 国民经济和社会发展第十二个五年规划的建议.

[2] 俞明德, 徐之强, 陈厚铭, 陈建良, 管中闵, 蔡颖义, 谢明慧 (2011) 台湾产业发展的规划蓝图. 台湾总统府.

[3] Kaplan, R.S. and Norton, D.P. (2004) The strategy map: Guide to aligning intangible assets. Strategy & Leadership, 32, 10-17.

[4] 胡贝蒂 (2012) 拚转骨、顾出路-三业四化加速产业转型、提升产业竞争力. http://www.cepd.gov.tw/

[5] 台湾经济部工业局 (2012) 云端运算应用与产业发展方案.

[6] Ebneter, D., Grivas, S.G., Kumar, T.U. and Wache, H. (2010) Enterprise architecture frameworks for enabeling cloud comput- ing. 2010 IEEE 3rd International Conference on Cloud Com- puting (CLOUD).

[7] Lusch, R.F., Vargo, S.L. and O’Brien, M. (2007) Competing through service: Insights from service-dominant Logic. Journal of Retailing, 83, 5-18.

[8] Guijarro, L. (2007) Interoperability frameworks and enterprise architectures in e-government initiatives in Europe and the Uni- ted States. Government Information Quarterly, 24, 89-101.

[9] Chan, T.K. and Hiap, P.T. (2012) A balanced scorecard approach to measuring industry performance. Journal of Construction in Developing Countries, 17, 23-41.

[10] Pheng, T.E. and Boon, G.W. (2007) Enterprise architecture in the Singapore government. Handbook of Enterprise Systems Archi- tecture in Practice, 129-143.

[11] Masi, L., Fodell, D., Murphy, W. and Wright, K. (2009) Service science, management and engineering (SSME). Global Univer- sity Programs, IBM.

[12] Maglio, P.P., Srinivasan, S., Kreulen J.T. and Spohrer, J. (2006) Service systems, service scientists, SSME, and innovation. Com- munications of the ACM, 49, 81-85.

[13] Andrews, R., Boyne, G.A., Law J. and Walker, R.M. (2011) Strategy implementation and public service performance. Ad- ministration & Society, 1-29.

[14] Spohrer, J. and Maglio, P.P. (2009) Service science: Toward a smarter planet. Introduction to Service Engineering, 3-30.

[15] Im, J.J. and Seo, J.-W. (2005) e-government in South Korea: Planning and implementation. Electronic Government, an In- ternational Journal, 2, 188-204.

[16] Wilkinson, C. and Sardo, M. (2011) Negotiated boundaries: The role of social scientists in public engagement with science and technology (PEST).

分享
Top