可持续发展

Vol.3 No.4 (October 2013)

关于DOE在审核中国CDM项目过程中的严重错误的特别报告及其分析—对联合国EB理事会拒绝和撤消中国CDM项目注册原因的研究和思考(4)
A Specific Report and Analysis on Serious Errors Done by DOE in Validation Process of CDM Project in China —Study and Consideration on The Reasons for Registration of China CDM Project to be Rejected And Withdrawn by Climate Change Executive Board of United Nations (4)

 

作者:

李肇经 :北京文户经济咨询中心,北京

 

关键词:

方法学清洁发展机制(CDM)清洁发展机制执行理事会(EB)指定的经营实体(DOE)项目参与者(PP)项目设计文件(PDD)项目咨询方Methodology Clean Development Mechanism (CDM) Executive Board of CDM (EB) Designated Operational Entity (DOE) Project Participants (PP) Project Designed Document (PDD) Project consultant

 

摘要:

咨询方针DOE在审核中国某项目过程中发生的一系列严重错误在中国CDM项目审核工作具有典型的代表意义,它不仅对中国CDM项目的注册和发展产生严重的负面影响,造成中国政府和中国相关企业的重大损失,而且粗暴地践踏了联合国清洁发展机制确立的公平、公正、独立和避免利益冲突等原则,为此向中国DNA和联合国EB委员会提出详细的特别报告,本文正是在这一报告基础上所做的陈述和分析。需要指出的是:由于DOE的这些错误导致本应注册而未能注册的中国CDM项目可能多达数百乃至上千计,所以在以下报告中,我们专门对这些可能发生的普遍错误进行了归纳,通过中英文翻译与理解、逻辑思维和推理、一般常识和专业知识、客观性原则和实质重于形式原则、保守性、综合分析、方法学及其工具应用、内部管理、公平、独立和规避利益冲突原则等九个方面,对DOE在审核活动中的不当行为、错误和混乱及其发生的原因,进行了分类阐述和初步的研究分析,揭示了联合国清洁发展机制(CDM)在其发展和不断完善过程中存在的审核和对审核的监管问题,并提出解决问题的办法和建议;同时建议中国DNA开展相关的调查工作,并将调查结果报告联合国气候变化委员会。 

 The consultant, in regard to the serious errors done by DOE in validation process of a CDM project in China, as a representative sample which took not only a great negative impact on registration and development of CDM project in China resulted in a good losses to Chinese government and relevant Chinese enterprises but also roughly breached the principles of fairness, impartiality, independence, avoiding conflict of interest and so on, provides China DNA and EB with a detailed and specified report, on the basis of which this thesis takes its statement and analysis. It has to be pointed out: that it was the error by DOE that, probably, hundreds, even up to thousands of projects in China should, but had not been registered, on which the report we put forward below took an induction specifically for these common errors that could occur, listed in nine different subjects of English and Chinese understanding, Logic thinking and reasoning, common knowledge and professional knowledge, objectivity and substance over form principle, conservativeness, comprehensive analysis, use of methodology and tool, internal management, principles of fairness, independence and conflicts against interest, to make an elaboration respectively and preliminary analysis to the non-compliance, errors and chaos by DOE as well as its causes, revealing the problem relevant to validation and its supervision in the process of development and constant improvement of CDM, and bring forward a recommendation to these problems as well; furthermore, it recommended to China DNA taking an investment action on the projects involved and reporting it to EB.


文章引用:

李肇经 (2013) 关于DOE在审核中国CDM项目过程中的严重错误的特别报告及其分析—对联合国EB理事会拒绝和撤消中国CDM项目注册原因的研究和思考(4)。 可持续发展, 3, 123-142. doi: 10.12677/SD.2013.34021

 

参考文献

分享
Top